[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
- Subject: Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
- From: David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhSPAM@spidacom.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 10:10:47 +0100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.urban-transit
- Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
- References: <399DE6E7.7629@iprolink.co.nz> <8nl6c6$qht$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <399E22D2.422A@iprolink.co.nz>
- Reply-To: (remove SEND and NO and SPAM to reply by e-mail) SENDdavidNOhSPAM@spidacom.co.uk
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:16395
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:01:54 +1200 someone who may be David McLoughlin
<davemclNOSPAM@iprolink.co.nz> wrote this:-
>Why couldn't Melbourne's new trams have been designed and built in
>Melbourne for Melbourne conditions, like all Melbourne trams before
>them?
Cost perhaps?
David Hansen | davidhSEND@NO.spidacom.co.SPAMuk | PGP email preferred
Edinburgh | CI$ number 100024,3247 | key number 5432274D
Due to the amount of spam now killing e-mail I have modified my address
to reply remove SEND NO SPAM.