[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
- Subject: Re: New Melbourne trams have fewer seats than the old ones but they're longer!
- From: David McLoughlin <davemclNOSPAM@iprolink.co.nz>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:14:07 +1200
- Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.urban-transit
- Organization: Not worth asking
- References: <399DE6E7.7629@iprolink.co.nz> <8nl6c6$qht$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <399E22D2.422A@iprolink.co.nz> <a3rn5.5012$Xg.53227@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <399E3E04.3AFE@iprolink.co.nz>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:16827
David McLoughlin wrote:
> Hardly any. But the average distance travelled by tram passengers in
> low-density Melbourne is much less than the average distance travelled
> in high-density European cities.
Whoops! What I meant to say was the average distance travelled by tram
passengers in low-density Melbourne is LONGER than the average distance
travelled by passengers of the much shorter lines in high-density
European cities.
David McLoughlin
Auckland New Zealand