[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Impulse Fare to Melbourne for $33.00
- Subject: Re: Impulse Fare to Melbourne for $33.00
- From: "BJ" <macgunzal@bigpond.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:53:44 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.aviation,aus.rail
- Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
- References: <399766D6.9AA7B8B9@idx.com.au> <8n65s9$usk$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk> <399738a1@news.alphalink.com.au> <3997a23d.111742043@news.ozemail.com.au> <n_Ol5.87955$N4.2132892@ozemail.com.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.aviation:8658 aus.rail:16080
I think predatory pricing is valid if it can be shown that you are selling
fares at below cost. In this instance QF/AN probably would have a case if it
was worth the effort.
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:n_Ol5.87955>
> > Interesting question for the bush laywers, is
> > this a form of predatory pricing? Could QANTAS
> > or Ansett have a case for complaint with the ACCC?
>
> Corse not.
>
>