[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Impulse Fare to Melbourne for $33.00
- Subject: Re: Impulse Fare to Melbourne for $33.00
- From: "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:30:02 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.aviation,aus.rail
- Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
- References: <399766D6.9AA7B8B9@idx.com.au> <8n65s9$usk$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk> <399738a1@news.alphalink.com.au> <3997a23d.111742043@news.ozemail.com.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.aviation:8651 aus.rail:16067
Ashley Wright <ajwright@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message 3997a23d.111742043@news.ozemail.com.au">news:3997a23d.111742043@news.ozemail.com.au...
> Mathew Klock <klocm@stbedes.melb.catholic.edu.au> wrote
>> I was told the other day that the airlines
>> can't go lower than $20 one way per ticket..
> They could go as low as they wanted to,
> they aren't making anything on $33 anyway.
You dont know that with seats that would otherwise fly empty.
> As has been said before these seats are not on every flight
> and are limited in availability, meaning that some people are
> paying the full fare. The cheapies are just filling up what
> would have been empty seats, at very little extra costs.
Precisely, so your claim that they cant make money at $33 is wrong.
They can as long as those seats would otherwise fly empty.
> Secondly I would think the whole idea is to get
> people flying with them and hope they like it they
> will come back next time (at the higher fare).
Maybe. 4
> Interesting question for the bush laywers, is
> this a form of predatory pricing? Could QANTAS
> or Ansett have a case for complaint with the ACCC?
Corse not.