[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Heritage (was: [Seattle] Melbourne W2 involved in accident)
- Subject: Heritage (was: [Seattle] Melbourne W2 involved in accident)
- From: James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 15:31:25 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.urban-transit
- Organization: Victorian Railfan Web Site - http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
- References: <Md1k5.1522$S96.10198@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3990F6FC.7F41@iprolink.co.nz> <8ms739$hfd$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk> <3991B738.1DA1@iprolink.co.nz> <DXnk5.5137$pu4.379033@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net> <1ef85ag.cy9ws77wgmm5N%stang@track73.freeserve.co.uk> <hjadpsotc9u64j8g9sq1aq849oo0mkhhhv@4ax.com>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:16036
not_val@uswest.net wrote:
>
> I dispute that Seattle route 99 is a "heritage" line, although our
> definitions may differ.
If something is old and it runs then most gunzels automatically refer to
it as "Heritage" no matter what condition it is in.
--
- James Brook -
----------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail:
mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
Victorian Railfan Web Site:
http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
----------------------------------------------------------------