Re: loco 3802

["chris@enet21.com.au" <chris@enet21.com.au>]

ok

James Brook wrote:

> If you are referring to my post titled "3802, 3820, R711, R761", take a look
> at the message inside it. It was a joke, not an accident. :-)
>
> chris@enet21.com.au wrote:
>
> > Seeing somebody accidentally named 3802 instead of 3801 on tour in
> > Victoria, does anybody know if there where attempts to save additional
> > 38 class locos in the late 1960's. When was the last 38 broken up?, (not
> > including 3813). I would have thought the streamlined locos would have
> > had preference over the others, but there is only one streamliner plus 2
> > complete non streamlined existing (plus one in a million pieces - and
> > just as many places).
>
> --
> - James Brook -
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> e-mail:
> mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
> Victorian Railfan Web Site:
> http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------