Re: loco 3802

[James Brook <ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au>]

If you are referring to my post titled "3802, 3820, R711, R761", take a look
at the message inside it. It was a joke, not an accident. :-)

chris@enet21.com.au wrote:

> Seeing somebody accidentally named 3802 instead of 3801 on tour in
> Victoria, does anybody know if there where attempts to save additional
> 38 class locos in the late 1960's. When was the last 38 broken up?, (not
> including 3813). I would have thought the streamlined locos would have
> had preference over the others, but there is only one streamliner plus 2
> complete non streamlined existing (plus one in a million pieces - and
> just as many places).



--
- James Brook -

----------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail:
mailto:ajmbrook@ozemail.com.au
Victorian Railfan Web Site:
http://www.railpage.org.au/vr/
----------------------------------------------------------------