[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: QR okay for Y2K

Subject: Re: QR okay for Y2K
From: "Peter Dwyer" <peter.dwyer@qr.com.au>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 15:12:36 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Who Knows
References: <KWUI3.31$99.399428@news0.optus.net.au> <01bf0bb6$c53e2180$367228cb@default> <8E528327BtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net> <938752541.428631@diddley.primus.com.au>


Switched On <yaropolk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
938752541.428631@diddley.primus.com.au">news:938752541.428631@diddley.primus.com.au...
> What about the interlockings and train control systems?

Tested. Compliant when all of the forms are filled in, I's dotted & T's
crossed.

References:
- QR okay for Y2K
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: QR okay for Y2K
  - From: "dirtcircuitvideos" <dirtcircuitvideos@bigpond.com>
- Re: QR okay for Y2K
  - From: Michael <mk@netstra.com.au>
- Re: QR okay for Y2K
  - From: "Switched On" <yaropolk@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: QR going national?
Next by Date: Re: QR going national?
Prev by thread: Re: QR okay for Y2K
Next by thread: Re: QR okay for Y2K
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread