[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ringwood Failure and SRV trip
- Subject: Re: Ringwood Failure and SRV trip
- From: Iming Chan <ichan@primus.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:32:29 +1000
- Cache-Post-Path: diddley.primus.com.au!unknown@mrac108-233.ports.primus.com.au
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Internet Primus
- References: <7rg3e7$dnr$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <37dc79ae@news.virtual.net.au>
- Reply-To: ichan@primus.com.au
Jim Leppitt wrote:
> Could someone please explain why the loco had to run to Mitcham?
> The track layout allows for running round a train in Plat 3 (down), is it
> the signalling that does not allow it? Spend $8m and don't even provide a
> loco run around!
Up trains cannot depart from platform 3 at Ringwood, as the crossover that allow
such movement was removed earlier.
> If this is the case, why did Steamrail not run a diesel on the 'other' end
> of the train like 707Ops do when they come out this way?
> thanks
> Jim
Cheers,
I.C.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Iming Chan
Melbourne, Australia Email: ichan@primus.com.au
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This message only contains opinion of the author above. It does not
express the views, policies or opinions of organisations represented by
the author.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------