Re: aus.rail etiquette (was Very Fast Train appears all but dead)

["WhaleOilBeefHooked" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>]

David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au> wrote in message
m1vP3.11$c52.158645@news0.optus.net.au">news:m1vP3.11$c52.158645@news0.optus.net.au...
> WhaleOilBeefHooked (daproc@spambait.umpires.com) wrote:
> > David Bromage <dbromage@fang.omni.com.au> wrote in message
> > gLdP3.25$2i1.146155@news0.optus.net.au">news:gLdP3.25$2i1.146155@news0.optus.net.au...
> > > WhaleOilBeefHooked (daproc@spambait.umpires.com) wrote:
> > > > Why not both? Then those that want the URL can have it (and wander
off
> > to
> > > > see if it is there) and those who come on late can still see the
> > article.
> > >
> > > To avoid copyright problems, an acceptable compromise is to post the
URL
> > > and the first few lines (not more than 10% of the article, not
including
> > > the title).
>
> > But for tsomethign that is already in the public domain (newspaper
articles)
> > and for something that will change in a day or two, a full article is
> > warranted.
>
> Reproducing newspaper articles in full is a breach of copyright.

Where did I say it wasn't?

DaveP