[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Surrey Hills - another crossing failure II

Subject: Re: Surrey Hills - another crossing failure II
From: David McLoughlin <davemcl@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 07:58:08 +1200
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Remove REMOVE to reply
References: <01be9604$68fd0300$022d11cb@rodsmith> <01be9d13$aefb5940$ef2e11cb@rodsmith> <926861892.639335@woody.hotkey.net.au> <01beaa6a$bb00ce00$1c2e11cb@rodsmith>

Roderick Smith wrote:

> Lowering the railway at the time of construction of the third track would
> have been relatively cheap, and would have eliminated two crossings with
> one project.

And when a new road/tram bridge was built over the south-eastern freeway
at Gardiner in 1996, the railway level crossing was left in place
despite the chaos it causes and the delays for the No 72 tram.

References:
- Surrey Hills - another crossing failure
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: Surrey Hills - another crossing failure II
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>
- Re: Surrey Hills - another crossing failure II
  - From: "Michael Walker" <walker@hotkey.net.au>
- Re: Surrey Hills - another crossing failure II
  - From: "Roderick Smith" <rodsmith@werple.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: 80th anniversary of suburban 1500 V dc electrification
Next by Date: @home & networks 6298
Prev by thread: Re: Surrey Hills - another crossing failure II
Next by thread: Re: Surrey Hills - another crossing failure II
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread