Re: N/NA class (was: Re: NA 1874)

[David Langley <del@ancc.com.au>]

Notagunzel wrote:

> MarkBau1 <markbau1@aol.comQQQQyuk> wrote in message
> 19990505035336.07846.00002285@ng-cr1.aol.com">news:19990505035336.07846.00002285@ng-cr1.aol.com...
>
> > Seriously though, whilst talking about NA's. (the steam type) Whats the
> staus
> > of G42, when will it run, if ever? Seems like they have been rebuilding it
> for
> > decades!
>
> Aww come on, that means there's another 10 years to go....
>
> They seem to have enough trouble keeping the existing 4 NA's going, perhaps
> they should just give in and procure more DH's, fling the NA's and become a
> real proper modern railway...

With electric staff and mechanical interlocking?????

DEL