Re: N/NA class (was: Re: NA 1874)

["Notagunzel" <notagunzel@bigfoot.com>]

David Langley <del@ancc.com.au> wrote in message
3733C6CD.74FB08CF@ancc.com.au">news:3733C6CD.74FB08CF@ancc.com.au...

> Notagunzel wrote:

> > They seem to have enough trouble keeping the existing 4 NA's going,
perhaps
> > they should just give in and procure more DH's, fling the NA's and
become a
> > real proper modern railway...

> With electric staff and mechanical interlocking?????

No, trailable points and train orders...  :o(

(Trailable points might appear, but there is opposition to the concept of
train orders).

--
Mr B.
Certified Gunzel.
notagunzel@bigfoot.com
(Wasting too much time at http://www.bigfoot.com/~notagunzel)