[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EL's for QR

Subject: Re: EL's for QR
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 01:46:49 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3700a24a.0@news.bris.corplink.com.au> <3700AF0A.34EB806F@fastlink.com.au> <PafM2.4$ch2.322596@news0.optus.net.au>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au

David Bromage wrote:

> Tim Arnot (timarnot@fastlink.com.au) wrote:
> > Does the contract stipulate an NR? What about an 81/BL/DL class loco -
> > cheaper than an NR if the Overland experience is any guide...........
>
> NR would probably put on whatever was most suitable for the job. The full
> 21 car GSPE would be considerably heavier than a 6 car Overland, so on the
> North Coast line an NR would probably be necessary.

Remembering that the GSPE cars do not weigh as much as most standard guage
rollingstock...

--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

References:
- EL's for QR
  - From: "MattyQ" <matticue@corplink.com.au>
- Re: EL's for QR
  - From: Tim Arnot <timarnot@fastlink.com.au>
- Re: EL's for QR
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)

Prev by Date: Re: Who Knows
Next by Date: Re: Rail Frequiences
Prev by thread: Re: EL's for QR
Next by thread: Re: EL's for QR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread