[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BLs vs NRS

Subject: Re: BLs vs NRS
From: Graham D Baker <bakerss@ozdocs.net.au>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 15:43:04 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Baker's Scale Reproduction Models
References: <mauried.276.36EDBEA4@commslab.gov.au> <LxpH2.20$E52.545304@news0.optus.net.au> <36eef3e7.0@nap-ns1> <mauried.278.36EF11C8@commslab.gov.au> <36EF67DD.303087C5@melbpc.org.au> <7cnpm5$70n$2@news.mel.aone.net.au>

Obviously you've never had to drive one over a long distance or any distance
probably.

They are draughty, smelly, noisy old pieces of crap...

They don't have Super Series, only IDAC. Although 3000hp, they don't have
the hauling capacity of a 81 or G.

And for those long trips they don't even have a toilet on board.

David Proctor wrote:

> Jennifer Richmond wrote in message <36EF67DD.303087C5@melbpc.org.au>...
>
> >Hear hear, bring back the Cs, LONG LIVE THE Cs!!!!!
>
> I agree - they were one of the best looking locos to grace South-Eastern
> Australia!
>
> DaveP

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>

References:
- BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "Grahame Ferguson" <grahamef@users.mcmedia.com.au>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: Jennifer Richmond <richmond@melbpc.org.au>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>

Prev by Date: Re: BLs vs NRS
Next by Date: Re: Sydney Rail Tunnel Tours
Prev by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Next by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread