[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BLs vs NRS

Subject: Re: BLs vs NRS
From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 19:38:28 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Customer of OzEmail/Access One Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
References: <mauried.276.36EDBEA4@commslab.gov.au> <LxpH2.20$E52.545304@news0.optus.net.au> <36eef3e7.0@nap-ns1> <mauried.278.36EF11C8@commslab.gov.au> <36EF67DD.303087C5@melbpc.org.au>

Jennifer Richmond wrote in message <36EF67DD.303087C5@melbpc.org.au>...

>Hear hear, bring back the Cs, LONG LIVE THE Cs!!!!!

I agree - they were one of the best looking locos to grace South-Eastern
Australia!

DaveP

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: Graham D Baker <bakerss@ozdocs.net.au>

References:
- BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "Grahame Ferguson" <grahamef@users.mcmedia.com.au>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: Jennifer Richmond <richmond@melbpc.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: BLs vs NRS
Next by Date: Re: 520 or 621
Prev by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Next by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread