[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BLs vs NRS

Subject: Re: BLs vs NRS
From: krel4203@netconnect.com.au (Krel )
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 03:01:00 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <mauried.276.36EDBEA4@commslab.gov.au> <LxpH2.20$E52.545304@news0.optus.net.au> <Pine.OSF.4.05.9903161406500.30954-100000@ties.itu.ch> <mauried.277.36EEE640@commslab.gov.au> <7cqi0g$jke@ob1.uws.EDU.AU> <mauried.201.36F0E653@commslab.gov.au> <7 <mauried.202.36F45BEC@commslab.gov.au>

On Sun, 21 Mar 1999 02:39:40 GMT, mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie 
>
>>> Are you sure that Cowan bank is only 1:40. From memory Cowan Bank is closer
>>> to 1:30. I will talk to the surveyor on Monday and get the exact steepest
>>> grade between Hawkesbury River station and Cowan station.
>>>
>>> Hell, surely someone in this news group will know how much an unassisted NR
>>> can pull up Cowan Bank???
>
>
>1295 tonnes , same as from Harden to Demondrille. (a continuous 1:40)
>The curious thing is , you will never see one doing it .
>
NRs regularly haul loads of 1250 tonnes plus up Demondrille bank. 


Cheers

Krel

Just another eccentric crank.

References:
- BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: arthur marsh <marsh@ties.itu.int>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "Ben Staples" <98711576@feline.hawkesbury.uws.EDU.AU>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)

Prev by Date: Re: Victorian Diesels.
Next by Date: Re: Where is Craig Haber?
Prev by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Next by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread