[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BLs vs NRS

Subject: Re: BLs vs NRS
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 08:30:36 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Another Optus Customer
References: <mauried.276.36EDBEA4@commslab.gov.au> <LxpH2.20$E52.545304@news0.optus.net.au> <36eef3e7.0@nap-ns1> <7cqibp$jnq@ob1.uws.EDU.AU> <3721627a.6882746@news.ozemail.com.au>

< Tell > (telljb@ozemail.com.au) wrote:
> I know a lot of folks hanging around this group think
> all you have to do is legislate heavy trucks off the
> road and force all freight onto rail.  Section 92 of
> our constitution GUARANTEES free trade between states,

Travelling between Sydney and Lithgow isn't travelling between states. :)

Cheers
David

References:
- BLs vs NRS
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "Grahame Ferguson" <grahamef@users.mcmedia.com.au>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: "Ben Staples" <98711576@feline.hawkesbury.uws.EDU.AU>
- Re: BLs vs NRS
  - From: telljb@ozemail.com.au (< Tell >)

Prev by Date: Re: Reopening NSW branch lines
Next by Date: Re: First Hillside, now Bayside
Prev by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Next by thread: Re: BLs vs NRS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread