[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Victorian branch lines

Subject: Re: Victorian branch lines
From: krel4203@netconnect.com.au (Krel )
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:56:33 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <7clfhl$4un$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <36EF4859.62E7@med.monash.edu.au> <9EIH2.23$Fd3.488001@news0.optus.net.au> <7cob7h$cpt$1@toto.tig.com.au>

On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 00:49:16 +1100, "Michael" <mk@netstra.com.au>
wrote:

>
>David Bromage wrote in message <9EIH2.23$Fd3.488001@news0.optus.net.au>...
>>
>>Maldon Junction - Muckleford is in place.
>>
>
>Except for a bridge in Castlemaine that was pulled down to make way for road
>widening. Or have they reinstated that bridge? (Pretty pointless for the
>roads dept / govt to do so considering they do not run the railway any
>more).
>
The bridge was damaged by a truck (how unusual). It was removed and
the road has been lowered at this point. Tenders have been called by
the CMRPS for repair and reinstallation of the bridge girder.


Cheers

Krel

Just another eccentric crank.

References:
- Victorian branch lines
  - From: "Janet Hoddinett" <hoddos@netspace.net.au>
- Re: Victorian branch lines
  - From: Mark Cauchi <mark.cauchi@med.monash.edu.au>
- Re: Victorian branch lines
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: Victorian branch lines
  - From: "Michael" <mk@netstra.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Signalling in Victoria
Next by Date: Re: Signalling in Victoria
Prev by thread: Re: Victorian branch lines
Next by thread: Re: Victorian branch lines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread