[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GEs for Victoria?

Subject: Re: GEs for Victoria?
From: sjesser@my-dejanews.com
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 13:06:14 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
References: <36D22765.ABABFE1A@acay.com.au> <amRB2.1243$la2.2329@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <Ch7C2.7$D8.415140@news0.optus.net.au> <36da1794.3907490@news.bigpond.com> <36dab22a.0@news.highway1.com.au> <NLFC2.3$fe2.294459@news0.optus.net.au> <36ddd2a6.3417070@news.bigpond.com> <7bo742$7ib$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

In article <7bo742$7ib$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
  jumboman@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>   Goninans have quite a few NARK engines at Newcastle under repair plus one is
> spotted at TOLLS siding at Sandgate with the guts ripped out of it.Great
> engines these GE's.
>   442.

Why all the criticism of GE locos? Don't bother repeating comments from
previous posts that they are just junk or garbage, or simply bagging Goninan's
quality of work. If there really are problems with GEs, what are they? Engine?
Traction motors? Control systems? It's just naive to think that Clyde or Alco
locos have performed faultlessly from delivery to scrapping.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GEs for Victoria?
  - From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>

References:
- Re: GEs for Victoria?
  - From: gonoNOCRAP@bigpond.com.au
- Re: GEs for Victoria?
  - From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>
- Re: GEs for Victoria?
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: GEs for Victoria?
  - From: gonoNOCRAP@bigpond.com.au
- Re: GEs for Victoria?
  - From: jumboman@my-dejanews.com

Prev by Date: Re: 131 500 rumor
Next by Date: Train Despatch
Prev by thread: Re: GEs for Victoria?
Next by thread: Re: GEs for Victoria?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread