Re: Scanning Photos

["Darren Yates" <dyates@pnc.com.au>]

Since this is something I have some knowledge about, I'll throw my two-bobs'
worth into the debate.
I think Ulead's PhotoImpact 4 is also a pretty reasonable lowish-cost
package that does quite a good job.
If you're scanning for the web, you certainly don't need any more reso than
150dpi and saving using JPEG even at 60% good quality setting is adequate
for most photos.
Darren.

Yuri J Sos/Melbourne wrote in message
<376fd5d2.3663387@news.enternet.com.au>...
>On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:26:12 +1100, David Bromage
><dbromage@omni.com.au> wrote, and I selectively quote:
>
>>I use Adobe Photoshop which I find easier to use and generally more useful
>>than Paint Shop.
>
>Agreed, but there is a slight difference in price, David: for most
>users, PSP will do 80% of the work at about 10% of the cost of APS.
>
>
>Regards
>
>Yuri
>--
>==================================
>Yuri J Sos
>Melbourne VIC AUS
>All locations mentioned are in Victoria, Australia
>unless otherwise noted
>
>Reply to: steam4me@enternet.com.au
>
>Web site is now located at
>http://www.railpage.org.au/steam4me
>==================================