Re: Tait Trains

["Grime" <grime@tpg.com.au>]

David Langley <del@ancc.com.au> wrote in message
3758EB91.71E692C5@ancc.com.au">news:3758EB91.71E692C5@ancc.com.au...
> David Langley wrote:
>
> > Grime wrote:
> >
> > > David Langley <del@ancc.com.au> wrote in message
> > > news:3757D7D5.D3A6F3E0@ancc.com.au...
> > > > Grime wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Having been accused of being pedantic, I'm not touching that one.
> > > >
> > > > But David you have a sworn duty to uphold, you must give us the
correct
> > > answer ,at least for Historical correctness.
> >
> > You're right so here is the answer.......................
>
> And the trouble with history is that it happened and it happened only in
one
> manner or event. Not like the future for which speculation about the many
ways
> it could unfold is endless. Thus you see that when you record or discuss
> history you have absolutely no choice but to be pedantic.
>
> Pedantly yours
>
> David.
>
> And the answer is???????????????