[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: QR and photographers

Subject: Re: QR and photographers
From: "MattyQ" <matticueQ@corplink.com.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 00:45:43 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <Zhfk3.3287$r61.24770@ozemail.com.au> <37927236.F61030C4@omni.com.au> <3793A3A4.515356F8@smatchat.net.au>


Rod Gayford <rjaygee@smatchat.net.au> wrote in message
3793A3A4.515356F8@smatchat.net.au">news:3793A3A4.515356F8@smatchat.net.au...
> Tell them to stuff off. They have no legal reason to stop you taking
photographs.
>
> Cheers
>
> RJG


So your advice is to tell a QR employee, who is following orders and doing
his job, to stuff off whilst YOU, Joe Public, are on QR property, eh?
Hmmm..... let's see how long you last.

The policy may not be fair but it is there. A simple request to take photo's
is all that is needed and permission is normally granted (I have been told).
No legal reason my foot!


--
Matt Smith
Brisbane, QLD.

Reply to matticue@corplink.com.au

Follow-Ups:
- Re: QR and photographers
  - From: petan@NOSPAMion.com.au (PETer and susAN)
- Re: QR and photographers
  - From: "WhaleOilBeefHooked" <daproc@sd5.mailbank.com>

References:
- QR and photographers
  - From: "John Boxall" <box@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: QR and photographers
  - From: David Bromage <dbromage@omni.com.au>
- Re: QR and photographers
  - From: Rod Gayford <rjaygee@smatchat.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Odd Cityrail announcement
Next by Date: Re: Cars make more economic sense than transit: fact
Prev by thread: Re: QR and photographers
Next by thread: Re: QR and photographers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread