[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.

Subject: Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 02:03:01 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <8E05AF8CAtelstraNews@vic.news.telstra.net> <378EE5BA.C7E@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz> <7mmqe6$f8g$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au

Christopher_Martin GORDON wrote:

> Not correct, if the level crossing has stopping/express selection it
> will be protected by a red/red signal, but if the gates have no
> stopping/express selection then the signal will be at proceed, and
> you could go through the signal at 'proceed' and the gates still be up.

How can this be?  What form of safeworking is in force where a level crossing is
not operating with a signal showing proceed and a train in the section?

--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.
  - From: "Tony Gatt" <baulko@tig.com.au>
- Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.
  - From: cmgord@ecr.mu.oz.au (Christopher_Martin GORDON)

References:
- Bayside Trains driver stood down.
  - From: Michael <mk@netstra.com.au>
- Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.
  - From: David McLoughlin <davemcl@REMOVEiprolink.co.nz>
- Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.
  - From: cmgord@ecr.mu.oz.au (Christopher_Martin GORDON)

Prev by Date: Re: CityRail (Sydney, NSW) diversions (a long gunzel posting)
Next by Date: Re: Melb.Australia Rolling stock
Prev by thread: Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.
Next by thread: Re: Bayside Trains driver stood down.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread