[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dr Beeching

Subject: Re: Dr Beeching
From: R.J.Drew@lboro.ac.uk (Richard Drew)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 06:00:25 GMT
Newsgroups: uk.railway, aus.rail
Organization: Loughborough University, UK
References: <7718qd$2bv$1@eplet.mira.net.au> <771u23$od4$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <na.a3bde748c0.a700a0tbc002@argonet.co.uk> <36973881.6079802@news.freeserve.co.uk> <3696913b.24256312@news.lboro.ac.uk> <369e7a07.17579568@news.freeserve.co.uk>

On Sat, 09 Jan 1999 15:52:31 GMT, news@nospam.freeserve.co.uk (Tony Polson)
wrote:

>On Sat, 09 Jan 1999 03:36:42 GMT, in uk.railway R.J.Drew@lboro.ac.uk (Richard
>Drew) wrote:
>
>(snip)
>
>>(Principal source of reference: "The Great Railway Conspiracy" by David Henshaw)
>
>About as biased and subjective a text as you could ever find.  

That is a statement I agree with. However, But you will note my previous post
only took the liberty of repeating only one suposition. Even a biased book like
this has to be based on confirmable facts. Do you have any problems with any of
these, or are you just making a jibe because I'm honest enough to post my
source?

-- 
Richard Drew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dr Beeching
  - From: news@nospam.freeserve.co.uk (Tony Polson)

References:
- Dr Beeching
  - From: "Daryl Cheshire" <daryl.cheshire@dse.vic.gov.au>
- Re: Dr Beeching
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@spam_this.umpires.com>
- Re: Dr Beeching
  - From: "Barry S. Doe" <tbc002@argonet.co.uk>
- Re: Dr Beeching
  - From: news@nospam.freeserve.co.uk (Tony Polson)
- Re: Dr Beeching
  - From: R.J.Drew@lboro.ac.uk (Richard Drew)
- Re: Dr Beeching
  - From: news@nospam.freeserve.co.uk (Tony Polson)

Prev by Date: Re: Dr Beeching
Next by Date: Re: Pantographs (was Re: MBTA BREDA Light Rail Cars)
Prev by thread: Re: Dr Beeching
Next by thread: Re: Dr Beeching
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread