Re: Dorrigo Rolling Stock

["Peter Ruxton" <rucko@bigpond.com>]

Trevor Edmonds wrote in message <76r60o$61$1@news.tmx.com.au>...

>To say that their costs were "invested" in the Dorrigo line is stretching
>it. Their costs of cancelling our lease, then having to enact legislation
to
>make the cancellation legal, and then spending years going through a
>tendering process, which ultimately failed, was their choice. It was hardly
>money spent for our benefit, and it has cost us an enormous amount of money
>for legals not to mention time and deterioration of the line.
>
>Trevor
>


The circumstance of the lease or proposed lease is a subject I will stay out
of.

However I can assure you the Legal Profession is alive and Thriving
especially at the Public Teat