[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: conditions as train operators

Subject: Re: conditions as train operators
From: royboy@DELETE_THIS.bit.net.au (Roy Wilke)
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 23:43:37 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <38486def_3@news1.vip.uk.com> <82emgc$iit$1@lios.apana.org.au> <82ga41$c1d$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <82ggcg$lko$1@lios.apana.org.au> <82iqvj$6sh$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <82jt85$179$1@lios.apana.org.au> <h4k34.145$_H3.639@ozemail.com.au> <82m1ln$cvs$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

On Wed, 08 Dec 1999 16:40:25 GMT, Vaughan Williams
<ender2000@my-deja.com> wrote:

>Thats not too bad.
>Remember that the cost of living in London is a lot higher than it is
>here and so average wages are higher there too.
>
>Average weekly earnings is something like $36k, so why do you say train
>drivers are doing particularly badly?

Average WEEKLY earnings of $36,000? That works out to be an average
ANNUAL salary of $1,872,000.

Can I become a train driver too? <grin>

References:
- conditions as train operators
  - From: "minitel" <minitel@arsenalfc.net>
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: craigd@lios.apana.org.au (C. Dewick)
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: "Rod" <comtrain@mpx.com.au>
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: craigd@lios.apana.org.au (C. Dewick)
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: "Rod" <comtrain@mpx.com.au>
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: craigd@lios.apana.org.au (C. Dewick)
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: "John Kerley" <deaftech@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: conditions as train operators
  - From: Vaughan Williams <ender2000@my-deja.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Glenbrook - Vandalised Phone
Next by Date: Hotham Valley Tourist Railway
Prev by thread: Re: conditions as train operators
Next by thread: Re: conditions as train operators
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread