[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Australian Railway Digest (was NSW Railway Digest)
- Subject: Re: Australian Railway Digest (was NSW Railway Digest)
- From: Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 09:55:57 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: University of Queensland
- References: <3842565B.B4606B57@zeta.org.au> <qGu04.1819$5K1.12125@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <38448b4d@nap-ns1>
Grahame Ferguson wrote:
> The Digest is the only true objective national rail magazine. The present
> Track & Signal and the old Network were mouth pieces of the industry and
> would not criticise themselves.
How many people want to buy umpty-million dollar track maintenance
machines anyway? Certainly, I've never had the urge to buy thirty tons
of Pandrol rail clips after seeing the nice glossy ad. Well, there was
that one time, but the medication is working fine now.
I'm continually astonished to see Track & Signal at the local newsagent
- who actually buys it?
> Regards, Grahame Seymour Vic.
--
Robert Kearey Remote Access Group
ITS University of Queensland
Sentence fragment I don't speak for my employer
"This message double-encrypted with ROT-13 for your protection"