Re: Australian Railway Digest (was NSW Railway Digest)

[keithm@commslab.gov.au (Dave Malcolm)]

In article <3845B58D.8398F38@mailbox.uq.edu.au> Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au> writes:
>From: Rob Kearey <r.kearey@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
>Subject: Re: Australian Railway Digest (was NSW Railway Digest)
>Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 09:55:57 +1000

>Grahame Ferguson wrote:

>> The Digest is the only true objective national rail magazine.  The present
>> Track & Signal and the old Network were mouth pieces of the industry and
>> would not criticise themselves.

>How many people want to buy umpty-million dollar track maintenance
>machines anyway? Certainly, I've never had the urge to buy thirty tons
>of Pandrol rail clips after seeing the nice glossy ad. Well, there was
>that one time, but the medication is working fine now.

What's wrong with you? I've got 60 tonnes of pandrol clips and a tamper in my 
backyard.

Dave Malcolm
Tongue well and truly planted in cheek.

>I'm continually astonished to see Track & Signal at the local newsagent
>- who actually buys it?

>> Regards, Grahame  Seymour Vic.

>-- 
>Robert Kearey                   Remote Access Group
>ITS                             University of Queensland
>Sentence fragment               I don't speak for my employer
>"This message double-encrypted with ROT-13 for your protection"