[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 81 at Leighton

Subject: Re: 81 at Leighton
From: "B.R.McManus" <brm@global.net.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 23:23:26 +0800
Cache-Post-Path: pluto.global.net.au!unknown@universe-70.global.net.au
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Global Web
References: <371dd9fe.0@news.highway1.com.au> <371ef132@news.virtual.net.au> <37207307.0@news.highway1.com.au> <3725B160.DEBED2A@melbpc.org.au>


John Duncan McCallum wrote in message <3725B160.DEBED2A@melbpc.org.au>...
>
>I would like to see that! What would the gradient be to reach the
>nearest dock
>to the bridge? 1 in 20 ?
>
>John McCallum

John
depends where it cut around a came back toward Fremantle. I reckon if it
swung around the end of the Shell depot on the very south end of the old
yard near where the loco depot used to be, the grade would be no more than
it is now. Being the old loco area it would probably have polutted ground
and only cause problems if the yuppies built on it anyhow.
Brian

References:
- 81 at Leighton
  - From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterdspamtrap@nospam-icenet.com.au>
- Re: 81 at Leighton
  - From: "Jim Leppitt" <leppijlk@virtual.net.au>
- Re: 81 at Leighton
  - From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterdspamtrap@nospam-icenet.com.au>
- Re: 81 at Leighton
  - From: John Duncan McCallum <mccallum@melbpc.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: ACADEMIC INFORMATION NETWORK !!!!
Next by Date: FS : BRAND NEW vibrating lithium battery compatible with nokia 5110, 6110, 7110
Prev by thread: Re: 81 at Leighton
Next by thread: Re: 81 at Leighton
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread