[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Day of the Roses"

Subject: Re: "Day of the Roses"
From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:27:40 +1100
Newsgroups: aus.rail, aus.tv
References: <362AE59E.4872E00B@hermes.net.au> <01bdfb40$6dbb1da0$0d9c0ccb@jen-s-computer> <362D3ACB.DF6FC323@eisa.net.au> <363cc419.19351830@news.ozemail.com.au> <3638391a.11771956@news.ihug.co.nz>
Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Xref: news.mel.aone.net.au aus.rail:34676 aus.tv:68870

Albert Alcoceba wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 12:13:49 GMT, kingpin1@ozemail.com.au (Derek
> Woodlands) wrote:
>
> >BTW, the 46 class was generally run with just the rear panto erected
>
> Only when running light or in multiple.  Single units under load
> generally had both panto *raised* :)

Depending on the top speed.

--
David Johnson
CityRail Guard
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Day of the Roses"
  - From: Lambing Flat <"BullaCk"@(nospam)cia.com.au>

References:
- Re: "Day of the Roses"
  - From: kingpin1@ozemail.com.au (Derek Woodlands)
- Re: "Day of the Roses"
  - From: alberta@zip.com.au (Albert Alcoceba)

Prev by Date: Re: 3801 Ltd's PFZ2219 on IP
Next by Date: Re: New Vicorian rail/tram projects?
Prev by thread: Re: "Day of the Roses"
Next by thread: Re: "Day of the Roses"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread