[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Capacity to handle humungous crowds

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Capacity to handle humungous crowds
From: Eddie.Oliver@efs.mq.edu.au (Eddie Oliver)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 98 03:07:27 GMT
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Macquarie University
References: <6ekcki$178$1@mirv.unsw.edu.au> <350DC580.6DD5@iprolink.co.nz> <6eku5s$lme$1@news.mel.aone.net.au>

"David Proctor" <daproc@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>
>I dont think that ANYONE could honestly say that Melbourne has more than
>Sydney of ANYTHING when it comes to railways (except maybe level crossings).

Come now, you can't be thinking very hard if you say that.

How about:

More delays? (Probably not any more, CityRail has done its best to
catch up with Melbourne in recent years.) More cancellations? More idiots designing
ticketing systems? More trains stopping all stations for incredibly long distances?
More empty car movements which could just as well convey passengers?
More times when city stations are closed?

The list goes on.

Eddie Oliver

References:
- Capacity to handle humungous crowds
  - From: G.Lambert@unsw.edu.au (Geoff Lambert)
- Re: Capacity to handle humungous crowds
  - From: Dave McL <davemcl@iprolink.co.nz>
- Re: Capacity to handle humungous crowds
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc@bigfoot.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Thanks for assistance
Next by Date: Re: Oh no! More pronounciation questions
Prev by thread: Re: Capacity to handle humungous crowds
Next by thread: Re: Capacity to handle humungous crowds
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread