[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers
From: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 12:38:38 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <3581CE5A.CCE@rta.nsw.gov.au> <358113af.7879924@news.ozemail.com.au> <6lsl6b$guc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Reply-To: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)

daproc@bigfoot.com wrote:

> I don't have a problem with them

The majority of CityRail passengers clearly do, as even casual
observation of the filling pattern of seats in carriages with fixed
back seating readily indicates.

> Sydney commuters have been spoilt for far too long with bi-directional
> seating.

Really? I've never seen a bus with bi-directional seating.

> No other city in Australia has them for suburban trains

So what.  No other city in Australia has a suburban rail system with
the coverage, travel distances or passengers numbers of CityRail.

Cheers,

Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers
  - From: "Chris Stratton" <stratton.chris.cp@bhp.com.au>

References:
- Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers
  - From: David Mewett <David_Mewett@rta.nsw.gov.au>
- Re: Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers
  - From: nswsrca@ozemail.com.au
- Re: Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers
  - From: daproc@bigfoot.com

Prev by Date: Re: Concord derailment
Next by Date: IP carriage fire
Prev by thread: Re: Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers
Next by thread: Re: Why repaint/refurbish the Tulloch Trailers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread