[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why not just the TGV?

To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
Subject: Re: Why not just the TGV?
From: pcc@ocean.com.au (Les Brown)
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 03:28:08 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Customer of Connect.com.au P/L, Melbourne, Australia
References: <35AD5E36.7B4984A3@ozemail.com.au> <1998071621564100.RAA22730@ladder01.news.aol.com> <6om6rj$9h1$1@nswpull.telstra.net> <35AF3D0D.5F5F9EB5@ozemail.com.au> <6onoan$rvs$3@nswpull.telstra.net> <35AF6CE9.FBA7A01C@ozemail.com.au>

David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au> wrote in aus.rail:

>In which direction?  In one direction the freight speed is 20 and the MU speed
>is 40.  In the other direction, the freight speed is 40 and the MU speed is 20.
>Something to do with not having the correct colour speed boards or something.
>
Stanwell Creek viaduct is double track isn't it? If so are there any
measures taken to prevent two trains on the bridge at once?

Les Brown

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Paul Jones" <dj_argon@geocities.com>

References:
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: markbau1@aol.com (MarkBau1)
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: "Tezza" <tezza@atinet.com.au>
- Re: Why not just the TGV?
  - From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Melbourne - Metcard validation before every trip
Next by Date: Endeavour car ex Adtranz
Prev by thread: Re: Why not just the TGV?
Next by thread: Re: Why not just the TGV?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread