Re: A new RSA?

["Ben Staples" <BenKim@bigpond.com>]

I hate to say this, but if they axed 4000 jobs there would be no one left.
You may be getting your information a bit muddled. At the end of the
financial year, all RSA employee's were terminated and re-employed by Rail
Services Australia, not terminated outright.

Ben Staples

Eben Levy wrote in message <359DDEE7.C77D3630@klever.net.au>...
>
>
>David & Julie Donald wrote:
>
>> Most definitely the case.  Think of this way, they don't really need to
change
>> their stationery etc.  On a more positive note, it does mean that they
can
>> tender for business anywhere, and I think that is very much the
intention.
>
>I was looking for a job with them but it didn't go though, you know why?
Because
>they are axing 4000 employees, how can the do maintenance with no workers,
RSA
>will not be anything soon, they don't want to do anything.
>
>We will end up letting out to private companies for maintenance and then,
once
>they get awarded the money, they run and hide with it.
>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> David Donald
>> Springwood, NSW
>>
>> dsjmd@hermes.net.au
>
>
>
>--
>Bye for now,
>Eben.
>
>http://www.klever.net.au/~ebenlevy/
>
>A cat *WILL* blink when hit by a hammer.
>
>
>