[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broad gauge or standard gauge
- To: ausrail@railpage.org.au
- Subject: Re: Broad gauge or standard gauge
- From: nldoncas@cobweb.com.au (Nic Doncaster)
- Date: 5 Jan 1998 09:52:13 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Customer of Connect.com.au P/L, Adelaide, Australia
- References: <ge or standard gauge>
"Barry" <one@microsoft.com> writes:
> Has anyone got any ideas as to the future of the non commuter BG in SA.
wonder when the pro-bus Transadelaide will rip it up anyway!
I read that as part of the agreement between the Commonwealth and G & W was
> the conversion of the BG wheat lines in the east but what about the other BG
> lines. Who would want to keep a separate system with a different gauge?
As many are seasonal lines they could be converted easily but did G&W allow for
> that in the price?
>
>
> If they are not converted I can see them being closed eventually.
GW obviously thought they could make money, and undoubtley EP will cough up a
bit into the system.
>
>
> If they were converted how would this leave the SA govt owned suburban lines
> (I can't remember what the authority that runs them is called - SASTA? STA
> of SA?)
No - its the Highly Original Transadelaide, 10 years after TransPerth!
Does anyone know what lines are shared by suburban trains and
> freight trains?
> The only sections of line "Shared" by freight and passenger is some of the BG
Gawler Central Line down to dry creek (trains to Barossa and to Burra/the other
place whos name escapes me) and part of the Outer harbor line which is Also dual
gauge.
> Barry Campbell
>
>
Nic Doncaster
(a person who isn't realy interested in anything over 1435mm gauge so if I am
not 100% right, whoopy shit!)