[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Airport Link tunnel walk

Subject: Re: Airport Link tunnel walk
From: billbolton.REMOVE-To-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 23:21:18 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Magna Data - Internet Solutions Provider
References: <751hjq$jr8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3685cef7.6315276@news.ozemail.com.au> <765465$puh$2@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <36875fbd.1846358@news.ozemail.com.au>
Reply-To: billbolton.REMOVE-To-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)

On Mon, 28 Dec 1998 11:13:27 GMT, nswsrca@ozemail.com.au wrote:

>Just demolish the fill-in between the existing platforms.

The platforms have nothing to do with terminating trains at St James.
There is no direct running connection possible between the City lines
and the former central platforms at St James without significant
reconfiguration of the tunnels in the vicinity.

Cheers,

Bill

Bill Bolton
Sydney, Australia

References:
- Airport Link tunnel walk
  - From: boofheadpaul@yahoo.com.au
- Re: Airport Link tunnel walk
  - From: nswsrca@ozemail.com.au
- Re: Airport Link tunnel walk
  - From: "David Proctor" <daproc.spambait@umpires.com>
- Re: Airport Link tunnel walk
  - From: nswsrca@ozemail.com.au

Prev by Date: Yesterday's Indian Pacific
Next by Date: Re: Coloured Steam Locos (was: What's the difference between a steam and diesel loco?
Prev by thread: Re: Airport Link tunnel walk
Next by thread: Re: Airport Link tunnel walk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread