[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vic Tangaras

Subject: Re: Vic Tangaras
From: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@icenet.com.au>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 00:43:17 +0800
Newsgroups: aus.rail
References: <01be030f$8be84380$4f456ccb@torpan> <71jme9$ku6$14@news.mel.aone.net.au> <363d95bf.48874527@news.ocean.com.au> <363f0120.0@news.highway1.com.au> <3641b10a.55989813@news.ocean.com.au> <3653527c.17344000@news.ozemail.com.au> <36542699.9C611A0C@ozemail.com.au> <74cm5b$aut$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <74dhlr$69r$2@merki.connect.com.au> <366b0e97.0@139.134.5.33> <01be225e$94a25790$66618493@el2nt>
Reply-To: "David & Jan Winter" <winterd@nospam-icenet.com.au>

Was it the power bill, or the current capacity of substations that was the
issue?

I had heard the latter but the cynic in me support Ron B's suggestion.

DW

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: thalytgv@my-dejanews.com

References:
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: thalytgv@my-dejanews.com
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: "Chris Brown" <sbrown@dragon.net.au>
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: "John Wayman" <trecker@bigpond.com>
- Re: Vic Tangaras
  - From: "Ron Bennell" <ron.bennell@qr.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Steepest train/tram line
Next by Date: Re: Bromage, easy on the multiple posts!
Prev by thread: Re: Vic Tangaras
Next by thread: Re: Vic Tangaras
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread