[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BM 1 in 33

Subject: Re: BM 1 in 33
From: G.Lambert@unsw.edu.au (Geoff Lambert)
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 04:22:11 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: University of New South Wales
References: <74ap91$rb5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <19981205042710.15759.00000249@ng-fb1.aol.com> <36690ace.13124229@news.netconnect.com.au> <366a158d.0@news.camtech.net.au> <mauried.179.366B40F7@commslab.gov.au>

mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly) wrote:

>Its probably worth mentioning that the above is a compensated grade , ie the 
>grade is modified to include the curve rolling resistance.
>Some railways (like SRA) quote grades in their compensated form whilst others 
>dont.
>VIC & SA gradient diagrams are uncompensated.

How do you draw a compensated grade on paper- show the slope as it is
and label it with the uncompensated grade, or fiddle with the
horizontal scale?

Geoff Lambert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BM 1 in 33
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)

References:
- Re: Steepest train/tram line
  - From: jmullier@my-dejanews.com
- Re: Steepest train/tram line
  - From: markbau1@aol.comQQQQyuk (MarkBau1)
- Re: Steepest train/tram line
  - From: krel4203@netconnect.com.au (Krel )
- BM 1 in 33
  - From: "David Martin" <d_martin@mountains.net.au>
- Re: BM 1 in 33
  - From: mauried@commslab.gov.au (Maurie Daly)

Prev by Date: Re: Steepest train/tram line
Next by Date: Re: Privatisation and steam
Prev by thread: Re: BM 1 in 33
Next by thread: Re: BM 1 in 33
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread