Re: Leigh Creek

[krel4203@netconnect.com.au (Krel )]

On 5 Dec 1998 06:00:54 GMT, dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
wrote:

>< Tell > (telljb@ozemail.com.au) wrote:
>> michael.house@north.com.au wrote:
>> >
>> >In an interesting twist if RSA have the line maintenance contract watch out
>> >for some 442s.
>
>> Not sure what the 442 class have to do with it, 
>
>Being more or less identical to the 700, there should be no problem
>getting them cleared for operation on plant trains.
>
442s have much less Hot engine alarms than any 700 I have worked so
should actually be better suited for the Leigh Creek Line.
Also, RSA call em Ballast trains. Plant trains would carry vegies ;-).

Cheers

Krel


>Cheers
>David


Just another eccentric crank.