[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4401 and 3801 Ltd
- Subject: Re: 4401 and 3801 Ltd
- From: Bob <alco@acay.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 10:14:14 +1100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Telstra Big Pond Direct
- References: <3664B353.5F2B79CA@uow.edu.au> <742e83$mjd3@atbhp.corpmel.bhp.com.au> <3664FC7F.C2DFB08E@fastlink.com.au> <36666998.0@occy.pnc.com.au> <3668EC4E.A5CB5222@fastlink.com.au>
Stupid loco number? What's wrong with 3801? I'm sure they would address the
problem if ever they didn't have 3801. Until then they have an excellent marketing
tool. Everyone knows what 3801 is, how many know what the RTM is? Not many outside
the enthusiast ranks I would imagine.
Robert Harris wrote:
> Darren Yates wrote:
>
> > If you're going to market something, go with the name that everyone knows...
> > I don't think 4401 et all Ltd would work...
> >
> > Darren.
>
> Why have a stupid loco number as your name.
> Trains R Us would even be better.
>
> Locos will come and go.
> You can't call yourself 3801 LTD if you don't have 3801.
> It would be misleading and possibly open for legal action.
>
> rgds