Re: Outcomes of the Hines Hill crash.

Krel (krel4203@netconnect.com.au)
15 Jun 97 12:55:25 GMT

John Wayman <bushwalker@msn.com> wrote in article
<01bc76b6$370f3440$LocalHost@pentium>...
> I read all this stuff about ASW and DICE and variants on train orders and
> CTC control.
>
> What ever happened to the worlds best practice that we should follow as a
> country.
>
> The signalling engineers of Australia are probably earning a fortune
> 'reinventing the wheel' with the development of sub standard safeworking
> systems for sub standard long distance railways.
>
> Can't we just buy a good off the shelf system that works and install it
to
> run effectively and efficiently for the next hundred years like we used
to?
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
>
> John Wayman
>
>
Firstly we never did buy a good off the shelf system that works. That is
part of the reason that it has been such an alien concept for so long.

However 99.9% of drivers would agree that a National Standard System would
be a brilliant innovation. But there are so many variations of CTC etc even
within the same state. We cannot even agree on what a Green over Red signal
indicates. States that use speed signalling like SA and Vic cannot agree on
what Medium Speed is. We can't even agree on tail lights for a light
engine!

When National Rail was formed it was supposed to introduce a standard
safeworking system for interstate main lines but that disappeared when the
Track Australia concept was created. Of course if and when TA ever gets off
the ground there will only be enough funds to just maintain the existing
system.

The money that the feds are talking about funding TA with for the first ten
years for track and signalling and train control would possibly pay for one
towns freeway bypass. Until Rail gets at least as much as they pay in fuel
excise (most of which directly funds the competition) we are stuck with a
third rate system.