[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Connex trying to keep troublemakers off its station platforms?

Subject: Re: Connex trying to keep troublemakers off its station platforms?
From: spammers-will-die@austux.net (Jeremy Lunn)
Date: 24 May 2001 10:52:53 +1000
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@cwo.net.au
References: <TgWO6.73409$ff.565591@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <3b0c4410$0$6127$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <9ehj5b$g5h$2@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.0 (Linux)
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:37683

In article <9ehj5b$g5h$2@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>, John L Reid wrote:
> Why is this?  Do they seriously expect us to believe that there system is
> completely incident free and they are trying to cover up accidents?

I bet there is nothing they can do if you took photos of the damaged
vechicles.

-- 
Jeremy Lunn
ICQ: 19255837
http://jeremy.austux.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Connex trying to keep troublemakers off its station platforms?
  - From: "Rod [comtrain]" <freight_man@hotmail.com>

References:
- Connex trying to keep troublemakers off its station platforms?
  - From: "Paul Nicholson" <pnichol4@bigpond.net.au>
- Re: Connex trying to keep troublemakers off its station platforms?
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@optusnetdotcomdotau>

Prev by Date: Re: [Vic]Industry welcomes rail boost
Next by Date: Re: [NSW] Maybe guards aren't useless, they're dangerous
Prev by thread: Re: Connex trying to keep troublemakers off its station platforms?
Next by thread: Re: Connex trying to keep troublemakers off its station platforms?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread