[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: W class Trams are back!

Subject: Re: W class Trams are back!
From: David McLoughlin <davemcl*PISSOFFSPAMMERS*@iprolink.co.nzzzzz>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:28:53 +1200
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Not really
References: <3b039d3c@news.internex.net.au> <3b03e394$0$25467$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <slrn9gd1o9.29s.spammers-will-die@amalthea.dark.net> <3b07196b$0$25511$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3b0743cd$1@news.alphalink.com.au> <3B074574.69CC@iprolink.co.nzzzzz> <cIJN6.64304$ff.501073@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:37405

Daniel Bowen wrote:
> 
> "David McLoughlin" <davemcl*PISSOFFSPAMMERS*@iprolink.co.nzzzzz> wrote in
> message 3B074574.69CC@iprolink.co.nzzzzz">news:3B074574.69CC@iprolink.co.nzzzzz...
> > whitehat wrote:
> > >
> > > If the W class brakes were faulty, why weren't the Restaurant trams
> removed
> > > from service?
> >
> > There was never anything seriously wrong with the W-class brakes. They
> > ran for decades without a problem. Now taxpayers are paying millions to
> > fix a problem that shouldn't have existed.
> 
> Yup. I'm betting the restaurant trams never had the hi-tech
> avoiding-maintenance-costs (ha!) "slack adjusters" fitted in them.


Correct.

References:
- Re: W class Trams are back!
  - From: spammers-will-die@austux.net (Jeremy Lunn)
- Re: W class Trams are back!
  - From: "Johann Fan" <jyf@optusnet.com.au>
- Re: W class Trams are back!
  - From: "whitehat" <whitehat@alphalink.com.au>
- Re: W class Trams are back!
  - From: David McLoughlin <davemcl*PISSOFFSPAMMERS*@iprolink.co.nzzzzz>
- Re: W class Trams are back!
  - From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [Melb] Airport Heavy Rail Connection Needed! (longish post)
Next by Date: Re: [Melb] Airport Heavy Rail Connection Needed!
Prev by thread: Re: W class Trams are back!
Next by thread: Re: W class Trams are back!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread