Re: 131 500, then 4

["Ivan Smith" <ivsmith11@hotmail.nospam.com>]

"Michael" <usenet.spam@gunzel.net> wrote in message
news:90998C4F4gunzelT333@203.164.20.149...
> ivsmith11@nospam.hotmail.com (Ivan Smith) wrote in
> <abHI6.2781$76.10954@news1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au>:
>
> >I am in fact talking about the Tulloch (R & S Set) type carriages.
> >
> >The seats on these *are* a danger to my posture, because I really cannot
> >find a seat on any of them that I can sit up straight on, with out some
> >sort of contortion, spring digging, or lack of sprung support. The Kapok
> >dusting out of some of the older ones is also a fibrous air born hazard
> >as well.
> >
> >They are a disgrace, I'm sad to say.
>
> What a load of crap. If you don't like the seats, why don't you stand up?
> That would be a novel idea. Or since you seem to make a habit of not
buying
> a ticket then trying to take your fines to court, bugger off and buy a
car.

Oh you presumptious piece of crap! You bugger off! Habitual fare evasion
now?

Oh please.
>
> You can never please 100% of the population. And you seem to be the
perfect
> example of this.

Well there you go. I pay for service. I don't get it, then I'm entitled to
have a go whether you like or not.
>
> Trains are to get from point A to point B. Not for you to whinge about the
> seats or whatever. I'm sure if they changed them to Tangara seats, you'd
> whinge about them too, just for the sake of it.

No, not at all. I find the Tangara seats, and all other CityRail carriages
well upholstered bar the Tullochs.

>
> For the record, I find the tulloch seats quite comfortable.

Well good on you. I don't and they aren't.

Ivan
>
> M.
>
> --
> To email me, just remove ".spam" or else your reply gets directed to the
> bit bucket.
>
> Never engage in an intellectual argument with an idiot.
> They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience --
> (Unknown)