[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: DSRM is...
- Subject: Re: Re: DSRM is...
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 00:58:14 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
- References: <3ab55e5d.11964751@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <99ch66$ee1$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <7_Cu6.443$hb.2263@news1.belrs1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3ABB4352.652538F7@ozemail.com.au> <99mnmm$nvd$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ABEE4AC.DFE3500@optushome.com.au> <99mrhj$ofd$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ac8e620$0$25489$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ac904a5$0$25511$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <zCdy6.98$Z42.11892@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <3AC9DFF7.3F46DB12@cia.com.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:36663
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:36:39 +1000, robson <robson@cia.com.au> wrote:
>When is the last time the line was inspected? What condition are the
>sleepers and rails now in through the relatively open farm land between
>Dorrigo and Megan, or better still through the thick forest towards
>Cascade and Briggsvale?
I inspected it a month ago. The line condition is a lot worse than
poor and a little bit worse than woeful.