[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: DSRM is...
- Subject: Re: Re: DSRM is...
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 00:56:59 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
- References: <99ch66$ee1$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <7_Cu6.443$hb.2263@news1.belrs1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3ABB4352.652538F7@ozemail.com.au> <99mnmm$nvd$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ABEE4AC.DFE3500@optushome.com.au> <99mrhj$ofd$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <3ac8e620$0$25489$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3ac904a5$0$25511$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au> <zCdy6.98$Z42.11892@nsw.nnrp.telstra.net> <3ac96fcc$0$25469$7f31c96c@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:36661
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:38:52 +1000, "Trevor Edmonds"
<trevor_edmonds@dingoblue.net.au> wrote:
>We started investigating the line in the late 70s. At that time the
>condition of the sleepers was relevant. It was still relevant when we leased
>the line in 1985. They were still good when we reopened the line in 1986,
>and were still good when the State Government cancelled the lease in 1989.
>12 years later they are a problem.
I think you'll find the sleepers now grow vertically in the 4 foot.