Re: glenbrook crash

["<Type your name here>" <csinn@netlink.com.au>]

Dave Proctor wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 15:02:35 +1000, "<Type your name here>"
> <csinn@netlink.com.au> wrote:
> 
> >Dave Proctor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 13:31:45 +1000, "<Type your name here>"
> >> <csinn@netlink.com.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Have a read of this article, sounds interesting.
> >>
> >> [...URL being spammed deleted...]
> >>
> >> Is this the third or the fourth time you have spammed this article?
> >>
> >> Dave
> >-------------------------------------
> >I dont know what you are talking about? I tried posting it on Monday,
> >but I did not see it appear. I posted another article relating to the
> >accident about 6 months ago from the same web site. Why do you say that
> >I am spamming?
> 
> It appeared on Monday.
> 
> I class it as spam because it keeps popping up (by you) and you do not
> comment on it, just merely post the URL.
> >
> >What do you think about the article and what it raises about safety?, it
> >was written by an ex-railway workers who knows the NSW rail system very
> >well and the issues concerned.
> 
> Considering the source (Socialist Worker or something or other) i
> don't count it as credible. I prefer the actual report.
> 
> Dave
-----------------
If you dont mind, please leave your political bias out of the news
group. Whats the difference if the AGE or the SMH writes an article,
they to are commenting on facts, reports and giving opinions on the
issues. The WSWS is a great source of news, from a socialist stand
point.