[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: Worse than CityRail
- Subject: Re: Re: Worse than CityRail
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 23:14:46 +1000
- Distribution: world
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia
- References: <0LgR6.3064$Yr1.136962@ozemail.com.au> <30429a7f.0105310645.5f2f4831@posting.google.com>
- Xref: news1.unite.net.au aus.rail:38354
On 31 May 2001 07:45:11 -0700, bscaro@yahoo.com (Ben Scaro) wrote:
>Yeah, the Tube has its problems. But worse than Cityrail ? No way.
>
>On my local line, the Victoria line, trains arrive on average every 3
>minutes. And that's typical of most of London, with the notable
>exception of the East London line which admittedly is pretty
>infrequent. The only stations on Cityrail with that sort of frequency
>are the City Loop and Redfern.
Think about what you are comparing here. You are comparing the tube
to CityRail. The Tube is basically a subway service from what I can
make out, so you should compare our City Circle or Bondi Junction
Lines to it. On these lines, there are very frequent services
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.