[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard

Subject: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
From: "Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:21:23 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
References: <p.edwards-ya023580001503010917560001@news.unimelb.edu.au> <3aaff48a@news.microsoft.com> <p.edwards-ya023580001503011148300001@news.unimelb.edu.au> <IrVr6.460$992.2369@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <p.edwards-ya023580001503011514130001@news.unimelb.edu.au> <dk_r6.895$992.5147@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <98thca$g2qp@silas-2.cc.monash.edu.au> <V_zs6.5460$992.33000@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <ktBs6.35113$v5.73730@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <9067A5F17gunzelT333@203.50.2.80> <LKFs6.35281$v5.75057@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:33611

"Ted Gay" <tedgay@bigpond.com> wrote in message
LKFs6.35281$v5.75057@newsfeeds.bigpond.com">news:LKFs6.35281$v5.75057@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...

> > But Sydney don't have trams (-;
>
> Get with it Michael!!  What are those vehicles running on tracks, driven
by
> tram drivers??  Don't give me the s**** and call them 'light rail
vehicles'.

Umm, let's see. All of the bullshit I have here refers to "Sydney Light
Rail" - so I guess that means it is "light rail", rather than "trams"?

Dave

References:
- Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: p.edwards@its.unimelb.edu.au (Paul Edwards)
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Mike Alexander" <malex@bigfoot.com>
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: p.edwards@its.unimelb.edu.au (Paul Edwards)
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au>
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: p.edwards@its.unimelb.edu.au (Paul Edwards)
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au>
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Daniel Bowen" <dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au>
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Ted Gay" <tedgay@bigpond.com>
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael)
- Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
  - From: "Ted Gay" <tedgay@bigpond.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Melbourne] W-class trams
Next by Date: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Prev by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Next by thread: Re: Another example of lack of thought in MetCard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread